For anyone that stays up to date on the SEC’s annual priorities report, you may have noticed that the 2024 Examination Priorities was released a few months earlier than usual, to align with the start of the federal government’s fiscal year. The early release of this publication and the omission of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues are just a couple of the main differences you’ll discover in the 2024 report.
However, the relationship between third-party risk management (TPRM) and operational resiliency continues to be a focus area of the SEC and it’s worth reviewing two notable additions that will help you prepare for the year ahead.
Note: Text taken directly from the report is noted in italics.
The report states that examiners will evaluate how organizations identify and address risks to essential business operations. So, what’s considered an “essential” business operation or vendor? It may help to think in terms of the third-party vendor’s criticality or the impact a vendor might have on your operations. Here’s a quick exercise you can use to determine whether a vendor’s product or service is critical.
If you answer “yes” to any of these questions, that’s a good indication that the vendor is critical. Furthermore, you’ll notice that two of these questions address the impact on your customers, which is sometimes overlooked in the discussion of criticality or essential operations.
Once you’ve identified vendors that are critical to your organization, it’s important to perform the highest level of due diligence and ongoing monitoring. Periodic risk re-assessments and due diligence should occur at least once a year. Remember to keep a record of all due diligence documents as examiners may look for these.
In addition to essential business operations, the SEC also plans to focus on concentration risk associated with the use of third-party providers. Third-party concentration risk can refer to two different situations:
Depending on your organization’s needs, it may not be possible to completely eliminate third-party concentration risk. Therefore, you must address this risk within your third-party risk management program.
The SEC is just one of several regulators who have increased their focus on third-party risk management in recent years. Along with the recent Interagency Guidance on Third-Party Relationships: Risk Management, these priorities reveal the strong connection between an organization’s operational resilience and the effectiveness of their third-party risk management program. By identifying your critical vendors and understanding concentration risk, your organization will be better equipped to operate safely and soundly with your third-party vendors.