A vendor risk assessment should be performed on a third party vendor in order to properly assess and determine the risk posed to your organization. This should be done during both the vendor selection and ongoing monitoring phases of the vendor lifecycle. It’s not only a best practice, but really a regulatory expectation.
I often have clients ask me, “What should I do now that I’ve completed a risk assessment on my vendor and discovered that they are high risk, but really I know it should be a medium or low risk vendor relationship?” The answer is actually quite straight forward. First, let’s understand the difference between inherent and residual risk.
Inherent and residual vendor risk are different. Here’s how:
The same goes for completing due diligence offsite. You may notice the call center has received a significant number of customer complaints recently. You now notice that there is a high reputational risk.
Mitigating the vendor risk may include things like:
The vendor should be willing to share the requested documentation and comply with these requirements if they’d like to continue to have a good working relationship with your organization.
With the increase in vendor oversight, you’ve begun the steps to mitigate the inherent risk and you’ll usually be able to reduce the risk level. As a rule of thumb, we often see that clients can reduce it by one level (i.e., from high to medium risk or from medium to low risk). It’s unlikely that you’ll be able to jump two risk levels.
You’ve evaluated the risk and you’ve tried mitigating any risk posed but something still isn’t adding up. The risk implications are still larger than your organization would like to see. We recommend:
So, I hope you’re now better equipped to handle a situation where a vendor shows up as high risk through your assessment but know it should be lower.
There's also a difference between a high risk and critical vendor. Download our infographic to learn more.