Earlier this year, Fannie Mae released their long-awaited Day 1 Certainty program. For the mortgage lender, this represented a glimmer of hope to be released from certain future reps and warranty issues, should something run afoul to a mortgage loan.
In fact, what it means for the lender was that by using the report data from an eligible verification report supplier, those validated loan components would be eligible for rep and warrant enforcement relief.
Integration With the DU Validation Service Platform
As part of this program, Fannie Mae engaged with a number of data providers to integrate with the DU validation service platform. And, I should point out that these vendors aren’t actually integrated into DU, but are merely approved as eligible to furnish the information used in certain loan components.
- Verification of Employment
- Verification of Deposit
- Verification of Income
Also known As NPPI!
What does it mean to a vendor management team?
The Day 1 Certainty guide provides some great pointers as to best practices of vendor oversight…in the case of this program, it outlines qualifying criteria for a vendor to become approved as a Day 1 Certainty vendor.
If you’re new to vendor oversight and haven’t adopted these key steps in onboarding a vendor, take a look at the steps Fannie Mae outlines below. These can be leveraged and used in an approach when considering a vendor for your own mortgage operation.
Key steps in onboarding a vendor:
- Ability to integrate with the DU validation service platform (per Fannie Mae DU Validation Service Integration guide)
- External audited, certified financials
- Business and technical processes and controls for data quality and accuracy (must provide evidence)
- Information security penetration test completed within the past 12 months (must provide results)
- Documentation evidencing external review of information systems (e.g., Service Organization Controls [SOC] 2 Report or similar) completed within the past 12 months (must provide results)
During our research, we learned that each Vendor had to execute an NDA as part of the overall approval process. Again, another good step in the contract process is to enforce an NDA or Mutual NDA before proceeding with the official engagement.
So, we’re all set! Right? Fannie Mae performed the vendor oversight for me?
WRONG! STOP! KEEP READING!
On page 5 of 5 on the Fannie Mae DU Validation Vendor List, there is the following disclaimer:
- Fannie Mae does not endorse any particular vendor, and does not represent or warrant that any report supplier will meet a lender’s requirements.
- Lenders must establish controls to manage and monitor the vendors.*
- In accordance with their own regulatory requirements.
This places the oversight responsibility back to the lender, and rightly so—after all, the use of this data while offering some relief to potential fall out to the lender is ultimately protecting the GSE (Government Sponsored Entity) from potential fraud of key data used to originate mortgage loans. Their goal is to validate that the data used in the loan origination process is bullet proof.
As of March 2017, there were approximately 47 vendors listed as eligible. If your vendor isn’t on the list, the offer of relief will be appealing to your executive management suite and credit and risk teams responsible for loan performance.
However, it’s important to note that a strong third party risk program will take the necessary steps in validating any potential new vendor that is engaged to fully understand the risks and oversight necessary.
Simply relying on the “non-endorsement but approved eligible” from FNMA for those fortunate vendors will not satisfy any state or federal regulator. The best practice is to stay the course, don’t cut corners and don’t rely on a GSE vendor approval platform to satisfy the long standing vendor oversight regulatory requirements.
Learn what you need to know about vendor management oversight and ongoing monitoring. Download our infographic.